Contempt of Court in India | Types & Punishment
By Joy Puri
Table of Contents
Introduction
Addressing contempt of court in the new age demarcates a systematic balance between upholding the authority and fundamentals of the judiciary and protecting individuals’ rights, liberty and free expression.
It is crucial for courts to establish crystal clear guidelines and procedures for addressing notorious behaviour, making sure that individuals are treated fairly and proportionately with regards to their actions.
Moreover, in furtherance to that education about the importance of respecting the legal procedures and the role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law can help prevent notorious conduct in contemporary legal domain.
What is Contempt of court?
Contempt of court has been both historically and in modern contexts, stipulated as a legal concept which at priority refers to actions or behaviour of misconduct that undermine the authority, dignity, or the powers of a court, thus causing hurdles to the proper administration of justice in the society.
Turning the pages backwards, contempt of court has taken various forms by the time, constituting disobedience to the court orders, causing disruptions to the legal proceedings. Talking about the previous times, such actions were severely punished which were often with fines, imprisonment, or other punitive measures so as to punish the respective person who committed the act of misconduct.
In the contemporary society, the entailment of contempt of court has expanded to include violations of privacy orders, disrespectful conduct within courtrooms, and disobedience of court orders related to online activities. It has taken all these within its ambit by the time.
With the advent of technology and the birth of social media, individuals tend to intentionally engage in behaviour that fulfils the essentials of contempt, such as posting sensitive information online or disrespecting legal authorities in digital forums, thereby causing disruption to the legal framework of the country.
Types of contempt of court
Contempt of court, poses as a crucial ingredient in the legal proceedings in India. It has been enumerated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. This legislation delineates contempt into two categories: civil and criminal contempt.
Civil contempt proceedings may be initiated if a party fails to follow any judgment, decree, or order passed by the court of law, thereby obstructing the judicial procedure. Taking an example of the aforementioned, if an individual doesn’t comply or adhere to a court order of mandating the payment of child support or fails to appear as a witness despite being summoned, they may be held under the sphere of civil contempt. Such misconduct focuses for compliance with court orders and uphold the integrity of the legal system thereof. Moreover, civil contempt can be initiated by the aggrieved party or the court by the power of Suo motu.
Hopping on to the other perspective, criminal contempt entails about actions which tend to undermine the authority of the court or interfere with judicial proceedings mentioned thereof. This may constitute behaviours that tend to disrespect the court, such as making derogatory remarks about judges, lawyers, or court personnel, or attempting to influence the outcome of a case through improper means and misusing their freedom of speech.
Criminal contempt proceedings tend to uphold the dignity and authority of the judiciary, making sure that the administration of justice remains impartial and fair during the whole process. Moreover, criminal contempt can result in penalties such as fines or imprisonment, aimed at deterring future misconduct and safeguarding the sanctity of the legal process by the framework and procedures.
The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, enables a framework for addressing malicious conduct and highlights the procedures for initiating contempt proceedings. It provides the power to courts of law to take cognizance of contempt, conduct hearings, and impose appropriate sanctions if required. Moreover in furtherance to the antecedent, the Supreme Court and High Courts possess inherent powers to punish for contempt of court, independent of statutory provisions, to safeguard the administration of justice.
Punishment for contempt
The punishment for contempt of court in the case of India can vary drastically depending on the nature and gravity of the contempt. For the civil contempt cases, the primary tool is to compel the wrongdoer to comply with the court’s order, and the punishment may include a fine, imprisonment, or both. The imprisonment may be for a specified period or until the former complies with the court’s order.
Taking the matters of criminal contempt cases, the punishment may include imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or a fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or both. Although, if the contempt is of a grave nature, the punishment can be graver, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or a fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or both.
Conclusion
To deal with the contempt of court effectively and efficiently, a multifaceted approach is required to be present. Firstly, education and awareness campaigns must take place in order to inform the public about the importance of respecting court decisions and judicial processes thereby respecting the dignity and integrity of the judicial process.
Moreover, stringent enforcement of laws and regulations pertaining to contempt is a necessity, making sure that individuals are held accountable for their actions and misconduct. In addition to that, procedural safeguards should be in place to guarantee that those accused of contempt are provided with fair treatment and due procedural rights mentioned thereof. By implementing these measures, societies can work towards building a culture of compliance, respect for the rule of law, resultantly, the preservation of social and public order in the society.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in the article is for general informational purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Furthermore, any information contained in the article is not guaranteed to be current, complete or accurate. If you require legal advice or representation, you should contact an attorney or law firm directly. We are not responsible for any damages resulting from any reliance on the content of this website.
