Delhi High Court seeks MHA reply on plea for report on food served to BSF

By Vkeel Team


The Delhi High Court today looked for reaction of the Ministry of Home Affairs on a supplication looking for its status write about charged low quality sustenance being served along the LoC as guaranteed by a BSF warrior via web-based networking media.

A seat of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangeeta Dhingra Sehgal likewise issued notice to Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) and Assam Rifles looking for their remain on the affirmation of low quality nourishment being given to jawans.

It likewise coordinated the BSF to deliver before it the examination report and the means it has brought with respect to affirmations leveled by BSF jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav.

Also See: No Illegality In HC, On Its Administrative Side, Transferring A Case: SC

“The means have as of now been taken by respondent 2 (BSF) in such manner. In any case, we might want to see their report.

Whatever report you have, put under the watchful eye of the court on next date of hearing, February 27,” the seat said.

The heading came after backer Gaurang Kanth, showing up for BSF, educated the court that BSF has effectively done on the spot review after the episode.

“Things are all together. We have discovered nothing as was charged by Yadav. Be that as it may, we are further investigating the issue,” Kanth submitted.

The seat, in the mean time, declined to issue any heading concerning not making any move against Yadav, as was looked for by the applicant, saying, “Too bad we won’t go into it.”

The appeal to was documented by Puran Chand Arya, a previous focal government representative, in the wake of a video posted on Facebook by BSF jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav, guaranteeing defilement among officers and poor working conditions.

Delhi High Court


Disclaimer:

The information provided in the article is for general informational purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Furthermore, any information contained in the article is not guaranteed to be current, complete or accurate. If you require legal advice or representation, you should contact an attorney or law firm directly. We are not responsible for any damages resulting from any reliance on the content of this website.