Difference between Regular Bail and Anticipatory Bail
By Joy Puri
Table of Contents
Introduction
Bail has transformed a lot over the ages. Talking about the historical times, in places like ancient Rome, if someone was accused of a crime, either they or their family could promise something valuable to make sure they would show up for their trial. If they didn’t show up, they’d lose what they promised.
Coming to the concept’s understanding during medieval Europe, this idea got more organized with bail bonds and other agreements, but it still wasn’t fair for everyone. In the case of England, legislations started to say that people accused of smaller crimes had the right to get out of jail before their trial, unless they were accused of really serious offences recognized by the state. But in colonial America, many people couldn’t afford to get out of jail, even for small crimes which tend to create a ruckus.
Nowadays, bail is meant to make sure people come back for their trial without punishing them too much before they’re proven guilty by the court of law. But in some cases, bail can be too expensive for some people, keeping them in jail even if they’re not dangerous or likely to run away.
What is Regular Bail?
Narrating the stories of Indian law, a regular bail ordains, the temporary release of an accused person from custody during the completion of a trial or investigation. It is granted by a court or magistrate upon application by the accused or their legal representative in the purview of the case against them.
Regular bail is usually granted when the court is satisfied with the fact that there are no substantial grounds to believe that the accused has committed the offense and that they will cooperate with the legal proceedings in the future. Factors like the nature of the offense, the severity of the allegations, the likelihood of the accused fleeing from the related place, and the potential danger they pose to society are considered when deciding whether to grant regular bail.
If the court is satisfied thereby the bail is granted, the accused is released from custody but is required to appear in court for all further proceedings until the conclusion of the trial is finalised. Failure to appear in court might result in the bail being revoked and the accused being re-arrested in the respected matter. Regular bail has been enshrined as a fundamental right guaranteed in the Indian Constitution, aimed at ensuring that the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ has been upheld and that individuals are not unduly deprived of their liberty during the legal process thereof.
What is Anticipatory Bail?
Anticipatory bail can be stipulated as a provision which tends to allow a person to seek bail in anticipation of being arrested thereof. This thereby means that if someone anticipates being arrested for a non-bailable offense, they can apply to the court for anticipatory bail to prevent their arrest in furtherance to that. If the court grants anticipatory bail, the person will be protected from arrest for a specific period, usually until they are able to apply for regular bail or until the court decides otherwise by re checking the mitigating factors.
Anticipatory bail is defined under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The main aim of anticipatory bail is to safeguard individuals from harassment, arrest, or detention by the police in cases where there is a likelihood of their being falsely implicated in criminal offenses thereof. Moreover, the grant of anticipatory bail is not automatic and is subject to certain conditions and considerations, such as the nature and gravity of the offense, the likelihood of the accused tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, and other relevant factors as determined by the court with regards to the case.
Conclusion
For the case of India, expediting the bail process while protecting the rights of innocent individuals necessitates a true approach spanning legal reforms, technological integration, and capacity building, thereby creating a better atmosphere.
Simplifying bail laws and amending provisions to prioritize bail unless justified otherwise can streamline the process. Moreover, in furtherance to the aforementioned, enforcing time-bound hearings and implementing electronic filing systems can significantly reduce delays and paperwork. Technological advancements such as video conferencing for bail hearings and centralized databases for information can further enhance efficiency.
In addition to that, investing in training programs for judicial officers to ensure a thorough understanding of bail laws and procedures is crucial. By combining these antecedent measures, India can accelerate the bail process, ensuring timely justice while protecting the rights of the accused, which would resultantly preserve peace and justice for all.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in the article is for general informational purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Furthermore, any information contained in the article is not guaranteed to be current, complete or accurate. If you require legal advice or representation, you should contact an attorney or law firm directly. We are not responsible for any damages resulting from any reliance on the content of this website.
