The Rights of Freelancers and Independent Contractors
By Himanshu Kumar
Table of Contents
Introduction
In today’s rapidly evolving economy, freelancers and independent contractors play a pivotal role. They bring flexibility, specialized skills, and innovation to various industries. However, their rights and protections have been the subject of extensive debate and legislative action.
The primary objective of the rights of freelancers and independent contractors is to ensure fair treatment and protection in a rapidly changing labor market. As these workers often operate outside the traditional employment framework, they are at risk of exploitation, including non-payment, unfair work conditions, and lack of benefits. Legislation such as the Freelance Isn’t Free Act (FIFA) and case laws like Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles aim to establish clear guidelines and safeguards. These measures ensure that freelancers and independent contractors receive timely and fair compensation, retain intellectual property rights, and are protected against discrimination and unsafe working conditions.
Another critical objective is to balance flexibility with security, recognizing the unique nature of freelance work. Freelancers and independent contractors value the autonomy and flexibility their roles offer, but they also need protections traditionally afforded to employees, such as access to social benefits and the ability to address grievances. By implementing clear classification criteria and fostering portable benefits systems, policymakers strive to create an environment where these workers can thrive without sacrificing essential protections. This dual focus on flexibility and security is vital for fostering a fair and dynamic labor market that supports the evolving nature of work.
Defining Freelancers and Independent Contractors
Freelancers and independent contractors are self-employed individuals who offer services to clients without being bound by long-term employment contracts. They are distinct from employees in several ways:
- Control: Freelancers have significant control over how, when, and where they work.
- Payment: They are typically paid per project or task rather than receiving a regular salary.
- Benefits: Freelancers do not usually receive employee benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, or paid leave.
Key Rights of Freelancers and Independent Contractors
1. Right to Fair Compensation
Freelancers and independent contractors have the right to receive fair compensation for their work. This includes timely payments and transparency in billing practices. The Freelance Isn’t Free Act (FIFA), enacted in New York City in 2017, is a landmark legislation that addresses this issue. FIFA mandates written contracts for freelance work, timely payment within 30 days, and provides freelancers with the right to file complaints and seek double damages for non-payment.
2. Intellectual Property Rights
Freelancers often create original works, whether in the form of written content, designs, software, or other intellectual property. Generally, freelancers retain the copyright to their creations unless explicitly transferred to the client through a contract. The Copyright Act of 1976 provides the framework for this, allowing freelancers to maintain control over their work and the right to license it to others.
3. Protection Against Discrimination
Freelancers are protected against discrimination based on race, gender, religion, disability, and other protected characteristics under various laws, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These protections ensure that freelancers cannot be denied opportunities or treated unfairly based on these attributes.
4. Right to Safe Working Conditions
While freelancers often work from home or other non-traditional settings, those who perform work on a client’s premises are entitled to a safe working environment under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). This includes the right to be free from hazards that could cause injury or illness.
Notable Case Laws
1. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018)
This California Supreme Court case significantly impacted the classification of workers. The court adopted the “ABC Test” to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Under this test, a worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity can prove:
- (A) The worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work.
- (B) The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
- (C) The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business.
The Dynamex decision led to the passage of Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) in California, which codified the ABC Test and extended its application across various industries.
2. SuperShuttle DFW, Inc. v. NLRB (2019)
In this case, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revisited the criteria for determining independent contractor status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB emphasized the importance of “entrepreneurial opportunity” as a key factor, shifting away from a strict reliance on the degree of control exercised by the employer. This decision underscored the complexity of classifying workers and the need to balance various factors.
3. FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB (2017)
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that FedEx drivers were independent contractors rather than employees, based on the level of control and independence they had in performing their duties. This case highlighted the ongoing challenges in distinguishing between employees and independent contractors, especially in the gig economy.
Legislative Amendments and Their Impact
1. Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) in California
AB5, enacted in 2020, aimed to provide greater protections for workers by applying the ABC Test to most occupations. While it intended to curb misclassification and ensure benefits for more workers, it faced significant backlash from freelancers who preferred the flexibility of independent contracting. Consequently, Proposition 22 was passed in November 2020, exempting app-based drivers from AB5 and allowing them to remain classified as independent contractors while providing some benefits.
2. The PRO Act
The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, introduced at the federal level, seeks to strengthen workers’ rights to organize and collectively bargain. It includes provisions to make it harder to classify workers as independent contractors, aligning with the ABC Test principles. If passed, the PRO Act could significantly reshape the landscape for freelancers and independent contractors across the United States.
3. The Freelance Isn’t Free Act (FIFA)
As mentioned earlier, FIFA in New York City sets a precedent for protecting freelancers from non-payment and ensuring fair treatment. Since its implementation, it has inspired similar legislative efforts in other jurisdictions, aiming to provide freelancers with a reliable framework for their engagements.
The Global Perspective
The rights of freelancers and independent contractors are not only a concern in the United States but also globally. Countries like the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have their own frameworks for protecting these workers.
1. United Kingdom
In the UK, the distinction between “employees,” “workers,” and “self-employed” individuals is crucial. The Employment Rights Act 1996 provides various rights to “workers,” a category that includes some freelancers, such as the right to minimum wage and protection from unlawful deductions. The Uber BV v. Aslam case in 2021 reaffirmed that gig economy workers could qualify as “workers” and receive associated rights.
2. Canada
Canada’s approach to independent contractors is governed by both federal and provincial laws. The Canada Labour Code and various provincial employment standards acts outline the rights and protections for workers. In the Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller case, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Uber’s arbitration clause was unconscionable, paving the way for a class-action lawsuit and highlighting the importance of fair dispute resolution mechanisms for freelancers.
3. Australia
In Australia, the distinction between employees and independent contractors is guided by the Fair Work Act 2009 and common law principles. The Hollis v. Vabu Pty Ltd case established criteria for determining employment status, emphasizing the importance of control, integration, and the mode of remuneration.
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite the progress made through legislation and case law, freelancers and independent contractors continue to face challenges. Misclassification remains a significant issue, often depriving workers of benefits and protections they would otherwise receive as employees. Additionally, the lack of social safety nets, such as health insurance and retirement plans, poses financial risks for freelancers.
To address these challenges, several measures can be considered:
- Clearer Legislation: Establishing clearer, more consistent criteria for worker classification can help reduce ambiguity and ensure fair treatment.
- Portable Benefits: Developing systems that allow freelancers to access benefits such as health insurance, retirement savings, and paid leave, regardless of their employment status, can provide greater security.
- Education and Awareness: Raising awareness among freelancers about their rights and available legal protections can empower them to advocate for fair treatment.
- Technological Solutions: Leveraging technology to create platforms that facilitate contract management, payment processing, and dispute resolution can enhance the freelancing experience.
Conclusion
The rights of freelancers and independent contractors have evolved significantly, shaped by landmark case laws and legislative amendments. While substantial progress has been made in protecting these workers, ongoing efforts are needed to address the remaining challenges and ensure a fair and equitable landscape. By recognizing the unique contributions of freelancers and independent contractors and providing them with adequate protections, we can foster a more inclusive and dynamic economy.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in the article is for general informational purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Furthermore, any information contained in the article is not guaranteed to be current, complete or accurate. If you require legal advice or representation, you should contact an attorney or law firm directly. We are not responsible for any damages resulting from any reliance on the content of this website.
