Question Is About To Section 138 NI ACT

kindly email me Cross examination of Complainant at my ID jagmitsaini@gmail.com for better reply.

accused need prove that there is no legal liability standing in favour of Complainant. you need satisfied Court that accused has never borrow money from Complaint nor there is any debt/ loan pending equivalent to cheque amount. you should have asked in examination of Complainant source from where he has arranged such a huge amount. it is not necessary to tell exact date.

only transaction of amount is sufficient date not mandatory . it's one of good defence. but all circumstances and document can't ignore instead it.

the scope of N.I act is very limited.. please read section 20 of NI Act.. u will get the answer. In my view the defense taken by you is very weak

send ur case details

ok.. send it .. aap kis city se h aur case kaha chal rha h abi

if u can show ur documents thn pls share on my mail id or whatsapp email - advamit7790@gmail.com mob/whatsapp- 9017282151

it's all about cross examination.. and it's not that what the judge is saying.. if a complainant is saying that he forgot the date on which the loan was given to accused than they themselves doing their case weak

sadly the onus of proving that there was no liability or no consideration lies on you. the date becomes immaterial because of the presumption. you can show facts regarding there being no connection and no auxiliary transactions as such. Regards,

It would be better if you go personally to the High Court and argue the matter. You have a great chance of winning there.